[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Automated removal of RC buggy packages



>>>>> "Moritz" == Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> writes:

    Moritz> Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> schrieb:
    >> One maintainer doesn't get to block the removal of an entire
    >> stack like Qt4.  I think there's a reasonable point of discussion
    >> about when RoQA is appropriate, but there comes a time when stuff
    >> just has to go.  That doesn't make it a free for all, but for
    >> old, unsupported libs we should have a bias towards action.

    Moritz> We should even work towards automating this further; if a
    Moritz> package is RC-buggy for longer than say a year (with some
    Moritz> select exceptions) it should just get auto-removed from the
    Moritz> archive.


if you do this, please standardize a way for a maintainer to flag that
they don't want a version package in testing.
I had a package that was "RC buggy" for a couple of years because I
didn't have confidence in the stability of the over the wire protocol.
Similarly I've had RC buggy packages because I wasn't confident in my
ability to provide support across a stable release.

Yes, this could have been done with a block at the release team.
But I liked that I retained control as a maintainer and that when I was
ready I could just close that bug without asking anyone.
I know the RT is responsive, but those sort of little things like
letting people solve their own problems when it's possible do matter for
keeping Debian fun.

--Sam


Reply to: