Re: Git Packaging Round 2: SHOULD Not or MUSt NOT Github
On 2019, സെപ്റ്റംബർ 14 3:46:43 PM IST, Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl> wrote:
>On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 09:37:00AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> I will also support such a GR. I started packaging gitlab so we
>don't
>> have to compromise on ease of use compared to github.
>
>And, despite a massive amount of efforts from you and others, packaged
>gitlab is not fit for Salsa use. It hasn't also ever been in a stable
>release of Debian, despite being around since a year before Stretch's
>freeze.
And the huge amount of work we put in to maintain gitlab is improving the base package quality of Debian, especially nodejs. We have packaged many core build tools like webpack, rollup, gulp, grunt etc which makes it easier to build many JavaScript libraries from source (we had to reverse engineer the build process before these were packaged, look at d3-format and jquery for example). rails is another example which is useful beyond gitlab. Also all the new people who joins gitlab team strengths the underlying ruby, js and golang teams.
I think I have to repeat these in regular intervals in -devel and probably a better way is to add it to gitlab wiki page and share link.
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Reply to: