Re: Consensus Call: Git Packaging Round 1
>>>>> "Bernd" == Bernd Zeimetz <bernd@bzed.de> writes:
Bernd> On 8/27/19 8:52 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
>>>>>>> "Alf" == Alf Gaida <agaida@siduction.org> writes:
>>
>>
Alf> There are things i really like about PRs or MRs - they can be
Alf> reviewed, commented, changed without problems and fast.
>>
>> And as Sean pointed out, it's hard to understand the history of
>> the changes and comments after they hppened. What happens when
>> I'm trying to review a MR three years later and the MR was
>> rebased 4 times during the lifetime of the MR prior to merge.
Bernd> As long as a MR was not werged, the history of its rebases
Bernd> doesn't matter at all. People might even create a new MR with
Bernd> the same code changes but a completely different history.
Actually, no, people like Sean do care about this.
They want a record of the discussion.
What was proposed, what was discussed about it, and why did we decide
what we did.
Just like we have with the BTS.
Just like you have with a mailing list like lkml.
--Sam
Reply to: