Re: .deb format: let's use 0.939, zstd, drop bzip2
On Fri, 10 May 2019 11:50:17 -0400, Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org>
wrote:
>On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 05:42:45PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
>>On Fri, 10 May 2019 07:42:52 -0400, Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org>
>>wrote:
>>>This is really not a property worth preserving.
>>
>>I disagree. I frequently unpack .debs on .rpm Systems, especially when
>>I want to see how the rather nice behavior that I find in Debian is
>>implemented to see whether I can implant that hotness into the .rpm
>>world.
>
>And there are easily installed tools which I have every confidence will
>be updated to work with any new format so your ability to do so won't be
>diminished in the least.
If I can install rpms without hassle, yes. I often cannot.
Greetings
Marc
--
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " |
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834
Reply to:
- References:
- .deb format: let's use 0.939, zstd, drop bzip2
- From: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>
- Re: .deb format: let's use 0.939, zstd, drop bzip2
- From: Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org>
- Re: .deb format: let's use 0.939, zstd, drop bzip2
- From: Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org>
- Re: .deb format: let's use 0.939, zstd, drop bzip2
- From: Marc Haber <mh+debian-devel@zugschlus.de>
- Re: .deb format: let's use 0.939, zstd, drop bzip2
- From: Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org>