[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Remainings of old versions of packages in UDD / tracker



On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 09:25:01AM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> It does?
> mattia@warren ~ % rmadison -S -s unstable muparser
> libmuparser-dev | 2.2.6.1+dfsg-1 | unstable   | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
> libmuparser-doc | 2.2.3-6        | unstable   | all
> libmuparser2v5  | 2.2.6.1+dfsg-1 | unstable   | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
> muparser        | 2.2.3-6        | unstable   | source
> muparser        | 2.2.6.1+dfsg-1 | unstable   | source
> 
> 
> You have a cruft libmuparser-doc (that interestingly is not listed in
> the cruft-report…).

Should I file a separate bug report or will you deal with this?
 
> For the future, also what Lucas said may be relevant in some cases,
> although luckily it's a rare matter and not many developers need to
> mess with (or even know about) that.

I agree that you do not really stumble about this kind of issues in
every day work.  I'm just working down a list of packages which do not
have (or do not seem to have) Salsa in Vcs fields.  I could probably
create a more nifty SQL query for my purpose ignoring this kind of stuff
but I think its rather a feature to stumble upon this cruft and report
it.

BTW, if we are talking about this I found two other packages:

$ rmadison -S -s unstable libmuscle
libmuscle         | 3.7+4565-2    | unstable   | source
libmuscle         | 3.7+4565-6    | unstable   | source
libmuscle-3.7-1   | 3.7+4565-2    | unstable   | hurd-i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386
libmuscle-3.7-dev | 3.7+4565-2    | unstable   | hurd-i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386
libmuscle-dev     | 3.7+4565-6    | unstable   | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
libmuscle1        | 3.7+4565-6    | unstable   | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x

$ rmadison -S -s unstable libmems
libmems         | 1.6.0+4725-4    | unstable   | source
libmems         | 1.6.0+4725-8    | unstable   | source
libmems-1.6-1v5 | 1.6.0+4725-4    | unstable   | kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386
libmems-1.6-dev | 1.6.0+4725-4    | unstable   | kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386
libmems-dev     | 1.6.0+4725-8+b1 | unstable   | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
libmems1        | 1.6.0+4725-8+b1 | unstable   | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x

Please let me know whether I should file separate bug reports about
deleting libmuscle 3.7+4565-2 and libmems 1.6.0+4725-4.

Kind regards

      Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


Reply to: