On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 01:25:48PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I was seeking for remaining references to anonscm in packages in UDD.
> I've found the following strange hit:
>
> udd=> select source, version, maintainer, vcs_browser, release from sources where source = 'r-bioc-deseq2' and release = 'sid' ;
> source | version | maintainer | vcs_browser | release
> ---------------+---------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+---------
> r-bioc-deseq2 | 1.16.1-1 | Debian Med Packaging Team <debian-med-packaging@lists.alioth.debian.org> | https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-med/r-bioc-deseq2.git | sid
> r-bioc-deseq2 | 1.22.2+dfsg-1 | Debian R Packages Maintainers <r-pkg-team@alioth-lists.debian.net> | https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-bioc-deseq2 | sid
> (2 Zeilen)
>
>
> which means the source package r-bioc-deseq2 exists twice in sid. There
> is also an entry in tracker[1] mentioning version 1.16.1-1 which should
> have gone since a long time. The situation is similar for:
[…]
> Any idea why old versions of these packages might remain in UDD (and
> thus probably in tracker since it is reading UDD)?
cruft versions, usually hold up due to outdated binaries.
In this case of r-bioc-deseq2, the reason is outdated binaries in
kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386.
using rmadison is a very quick way to notice this, as you will see the
discrepancy in the architecture list.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature