> I don't want backports to contain things are are not suited for a > release. That's why we are doing all this. It is NOT about anything to backports. It is about adding something new that uses the same RULES as backports, with a slight diversion, and thus can also make use of infrastructure already there for backports. Neither being economic with manpower and machines nor trying to be a good neighbour by adhering to the same rules means to change or add anything to -backports. -nik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature