[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Tainted builds (was Re: usrmerge -- plan B?)

Russ Allbery writes ("Re: Tainted builds (was Re: usrmerge -- plan B?)"):
> Tainted is a loaded term that may make this more confusing.

Can we think of a better term before `taint' gets embedded ?

It's going to be annoying if we have to have an argument every time we
want to capture some additional data of this kind, because someone
will pop up and say `my build system is like this and it is fine' or


Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>   These opinions are my own.

If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.

Reply to: