[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#881333: Qt with GLES on arm64 maintainer's decision - Was:: Upcoming Qt switch to OpenGL ES on arm64

Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> writes:

> Long ago I heard rumors of development work on mesa that would allow it to
> function as a proxy library, so that apps would link against libGL as needed
> and the GL implementation would use a hardware-accelerated GLES driver where
> possible, falling back to software GL where necessary.

This seems unlikely -- I believe GLES and GL have different semantics in
a few places which makes implementing GL on GLES inefficient; mostly
that GLES is missing stuff that GL applications often use, but I think
there are places where GLES is just different, including in how GLSL

I haven't tried, but I would expect that applications could use both GL
and GLES APIs at the same time, even to the same window. If this does
work with Mesa, then linking Qt against GLES wouldn't restrict
applications using free drivers at least?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: