Re: Q: Best practice for maintainer address with "alioth"

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Q: Best practice for maintainer address with "alioth"
From: Alex Muntada <alexm@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 19:52:41 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20181001175241.hf3cgwgl3yddnni2@xps>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20181001165253.GB9732@thunk.org>
References: <[🔎] CAPpVEmUhq_MJkRgFwaWaqf9pWuu4O7q3aXxESPd4-2Z+e-AMTA@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] CAKTje6GbmiAeFf7p1uch5Sb+AtVQU5GcZKaf+dCUkgW63u0r7A@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20181001075959.6xkdyarkrcg6cnqi@xps> <[🔎] 20181001165253.GB9732@thunk.org>

Hi Ted,

> Is there something official from the lists.d.o maintainers
> about what their preferences should be?

I found some pointers in «Alioth: the future of mailing lists»:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2017/09/msg00004.html

Hope this helps,
Alex

--
  ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
  ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Alex Muntada <alexm@debian.org>
  ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋   Debian Developer - log.alexm.org
  ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- Q: Best practice for maintainer address with "alioth"
  - From: Hideki Yamane <henrich@gmail.com>
- Re: Q: Best practice for maintainer address with "alioth"
  - From: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
- Re: Q: Best practice for maintainer address with "alioth"
  - From: Alex Muntada <alexm@debian.org>
- Re: Q: Best practice for maintainer address with "alioth"
  - From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Q: Best practice for maintainer address with "alioth"
Next by Date: gbp import-orig has defeated me
Previous by thread: Re: Q: Best practice for maintainer address with "alioth"
Next by thread: Bug#910002: ITP: combblas -- an extensible parallel graph library for graph analytics
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread