On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 08:17:24AM -0300, David Bremner wrote: > Tobias Frost <tobi@debian.org> writes: > > > > > The split was actually thought to be a feature [1] :) > > It was to make the process itself less normative about the actual > > (concrete) figures/criterias, but still give safe figures to e.g > > necomers they can rely on, and on the other side enable more advanced > > people to reasonably deviate from it > > (but with a strong documentation/justification requirement). > > > > OK, I understand the reasoning, but I hope we can improve the wording on > both sides a bit so it's clear that the rule is "use your judgement, and > if you're not sure about your judgement, refer to these numbers in the > wiki, which represent a current concensus". Assuming my summary is > correct, of course. Yes, your summary is correct. I'm happy to make the wording a bit more clearer and start by shamelessly stealing your sentence as a base for it ;-) Cheers, -- tobi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature