On Thursday, 19 July 2018 7:43:39 PM AEST Wouter Verhelst wrote: > weboob itself is fine, maybe. But there are various other binaries > inside the weboob packages that aren't, at least not so much: > > wetboobs > handjoob > boobsize > boobtracker > > like, seriously. Yuck... :( Incredibly tasteless and probably intentionally controversial... I see your point and I agree with you yet renaming might still be inappropriate and/or ineffective. I'd like to see stronger justification for replacing uncomfortable reference to part of human body because why should it be uncomfortable? If double "O" is a problem then how are we not offended by Google? If we swap body part reference to another body part like "leg" or "arm", it becomes just ridiculous. I have no intention to defend this particular package but more interested in principle of justifying such actions. > > Asking person to change his name because it is unpleasant to us would be > > beyond rude. > > This is true, but not relevant to the issue at hand (which is about > weboob). That was about misuse of diversity statement. My point is about how inappropriate renaming might be, if pushed too far. -- Regards, Dmitry Smirnov. --- Continuous effort - not strength or intelligence - is the key to unlocking our potential. -- Winston Churchill
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.