[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: packages which have not been rebuild since December 2016

On Sat, Jun 02, 2018 at 10:36:58AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 01-06-18 16:32, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > … wouldn't we just binNMU these?
> There are many packages in your list that are arch:all only, and those can't be
> binNMU'ed. Still I'm not sure we can do some several thousand binNMUs. But that
> number could get reduced due to maintainer uploads and binNMUs due to unrelated
> transitions.

also, binNMUs break multi-arch, see #894441, so I'm not a fan (of the
current implementation of) binNMUs.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: