Re: Bug#886238: Please introduce official nosystemd build profile
On 01/04/2018 01:33 AM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Building without *libsystemd*, on the other hand, *is* invasive,
> precisely because libsystemd *already* includes the necessary code to
> handle systems without systemd, and building without libsystemd
> duplicates that code. The correct response to a patch to build without
> libsystemd is "no, that's what libsystemd exists for".
Does this approach also work for non-Linux ports?
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
Reply to: