Re: Bug#886238: Please introduce official nosystemd build profile
On 01/03/2018 08:01 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Catering to fanatics who insist on treating it specially, without technical
> merit, has no bearing on the freeness or universality of Debian.
Probably, though IMO if your sentence can in some degree be socially
correct (aren't we all tired of those fanatics?), it may also be
technically irrelevant. I still feel it's probably a sensitive thing to
do. See below.
On 01/03/2018 10:34 PM, Simon Richter wrote:
> Keep in
> mind we just had a discussion last week if it was truly a bug if a
> package fails to work if systemd is not present.
IMO, it is a relevant bug because of non-Linux ports. If it existed, it
would probably make sense for those buildd to always select the
nosystemd profile when building, which would make life easier.
> For that alone, the build profile is useful.
If adding my sentence above, then yes.
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
Reply to: