Re: Exclicitly or "implicitly" mark architectures a packages does not build
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: Exclicitly or "implicitly" mark architectures a packages does not build"):
> I see in dbus_1.12.2-1.dsc
>
> Build-Depends: ...
> valgrind [amd64 arm64 armhf i386 mips64 mips64el mips mipsel powerpc
> ppc64 ppc64el s390x]
> <!pkg.dbus.minimal>, ...
>
> which is rather WTF. Is this trying to do Build-Recommends ? :-)
>
> Is this something to do with a test-suite ? Maybe those tests should
> be autopkgtests instead.
Someone on #chiark pointed me to #728371. Good grief.
Ian.
--
Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
Reply to: