Re: UMASK 002 or 022?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: UMASK 002 or 022?
From: Simon Richter <sjr@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 21:49:12 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 2362751b-4270-f337-95f6-8af11763fe80@debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] c5e9da5acaf95b5f87d1f607422e460b@openmailbox.org>
References: <[🔎] 1861c59558861ef871b4baa493053b61@openmailbox.org> <[🔎] CAKTje6EB5Nw4dEN8j7gJRJG1uKgFgTP6SFe6b4-532ARnC3bAg@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 22867.37413.905892.132913@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <[🔎] 9a4b06be2963d855e7ee986ebbae9cec@openmailbox.org> <[🔎] b6e990b46f9317b58abf4289c7f18ab4@openmailbox.org> <[🔎] 20170630112200.ccdtocnrze6jhlec@mail.sl.id.au> <[🔎] 1498828662.6683.1.camel@stuart.id.au> <[🔎] f9d6cb88720da0b39cd9967a9f2626fd@openmailbox.org> <[🔎] 20170630160524.GA5405@layer-acht.org> <[🔎] c5e9da5acaf95b5f87d1f607422e460b@openmailbox.org>

Hi,

On 30.06.2017 20:41, gwmfms6@openmailbox.org wrote:

> When the average user cannot change the umask

Changing the umask is the wrong fix. The correct solution is to set the
permissions of the home directory to 751, once.

   Simon

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- Subject: UMASK 002 or 022?
  - From: gwmfms6@openmailbox.org
- Re: Subject: UMASK 002 or 022?
  - From: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
- Re: Subject: UMASK 002 or 022?
  - From: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: Subject: UMASK 002 or 022?
  - From: gwmfms6@openmailbox.org
- Re: UMASK 002 or 022?
  - From: gwmfms6@openmailbox.org
- Re: UMASK 002 or 022?
  - From: Scott Leggett <scott@sl.id.au>
- Re: UMASK 002 or 022?
  - From: Russell Stuart <russell-debian@stuart.id.au>
- Re: UMASK 002 or 022?
  - From: gwmfms6@openmailbox.org
- Re: UMASK 002 or 022?
  - From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
- Re: UMASK 002 or 022?
  - From: gwmfms6@openmailbox.org

Prev by Date: Re: UMASK 002 or 022?
Next by Date: Re: UMASK 002 or 022?
Previous by thread: Re: UMASK 002 or 022?
Next by thread: Re: UMASK 002 or 022?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread