On Dec 31, Simon Richter <sjr@debian.org> wrote: > > There are some cases when using sysvinit is preferred over systemd. [...] > These are running stretch, and I would like to upgrade them without > breaking my existing scripts, which assume sysvinit with runlevels > (including one-shot runlevels). Somebody having legacy scripts which assume sysvinit and that they do not want to change does not make "sysvinit preferred over systemd" as it is being argued. -- ciao, Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature