On Tue, 26 Dec 2017, Jonathan McDowell wrote: > On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 11:45:37AM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > Teams > > ----- > > > > For larger projects you can also create a group to host your projects. > > To avoid clashes with usernames (that share the same namespace as > > groups) we are requiring groups to have a '-team' suffix to their > > name. Groups can be created using the same self-service portal > > https://signup.salsa.debian.org. For larger, already-established > > teams it is also possible to ask us to create the group with a name > > not conforming to the normal team namespace. Examples are teams like > > *debian-qa*. Please create an issue in the support[1] project. > > Is there a policy here? I'm seeing a mix of formats rather than any > consistency. For example for keyring-maint should we request > debian-keyring as a group, or just use keyring-team? DSA and ftp-master > have gone for the latter (dsa-team + ftp-team) but I'd assumed the > former was more appropriate for an official Debian entity. > > Likewise for pkg-electronics I was expecting pkg-electronics-team (to > match, e.g., pkg-suricata-team) but I see things like libvirt-team as > well so the pkg- prefix doesn't seem to be consistently used/unused. > > Guidance appreciated. I don't want to make an effort to move over and > update URLs etc only to have to do so a second time because the team > name wasn't of the correct format. there is, and there won't be a forced format for the team name. We are happy to reestablish old used names (like qa), but I don't see any reason to establish a policy. Alex
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature