On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 11:18:21PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > I guess the question from my side is if the list of archive components > in §5 of the Social Contract is supposed to be exhaustive or not. I.e. > if we need to change that or not. If we don't need to: yay. (Maybe > because we editorially consider firmware not to be software or something.) hm, I think I'm standing somewhat corrected or shaky now, maybe this *needs* a GR indeed. Then, my previous wording left room for the interpretation that a GR would or could be good... ;) > Is that something the secretary could tell us? :P I believe so, yes. -- cheers, Holger
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature