Re: e2fsprogs as Essential: yes?
On Tue, 03 Oct 2017 22:51:08 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 03.10.2017 um 19:37 schrieb Felipe Sateler:
>> I don't think that's necessary as init is Important: yes, and both
>> systemd and sysvinit will have to gain a dep on e2fsprogs.
> Why exactly? To fsck/mount ext234 file systems?
> Keep in mind that sysvinit/systemd don't depend on xfsprogs, etc either.
I was going by Helmut's dd-list. Both might be a false positive though.
Further inspection of systemd sources suggests at least systemd is a
false positive. I have not checked sysvinit.
I guess e2fsprogs should gain the Important: yes flag then.