Re: User-installable Debian packages?
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: User-installable Debian packages?
- From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 23:44:34 +0300
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20170809204434.xjxejm2srtuseyuy@localhost>
- In-reply-to: <e4cd2eb8-1221-0349-3f65-c3f5853579ae@gmx.de>
- References: <20170722120006.hmu2uiwnld4onk75@perpetual.pseudorandom.co.uk> <874lu0u91w.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <1383f3b1-5401-cc77-018a-b24dc154cac1@gmx.de> <b1828166-2a58-5a0a-9721-1d6b692e56aa@posteo.net> <90df9784-09c2-3e29-39c9-fbd685aefd35@gmx.de> <87vamape8r.fsf@gentoo.org> <5d98ffcd-3c1e-6563-f5e5-d8a1652394b8@gmx.de> <878tj6p60t.fsf@gentoo.org> <20170730114706.2ubiv64s3yaz3vj7@perpetual.pseudorandom.co.uk> <e4cd2eb8-1221-0349-3f65-c3f5853579ae@gmx.de>
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 02:36:03PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
>
> Users will not care if it is flatpak, singularity, conda or prefix -
> they want
> all the packages and the packages shall work. What I like about all of these
> efforts is that from what I grasped we will stop caring too much about
> backports.
>...
> What it somewhat boils down to me is that we need to decide about the
> roles a Linux distribution shall have. And if we want problem-centric
> communities (like BioConda) to come up with a pan-distributional
> gentoo-prefix-like setup. The folks that are only after the immediate
> scientific
> findings will go for the community-effort.
>...
The main benefit of a stable release of a distribution is getting a set
of packages that are confirmed to work, and tested to work together.[1]
Backports are a workaround for the situation when a user of stable has
an urgent need to cherry-pick a specific package from the next stable,
but every package installed from backports brings the risk of breaking
something unrelated.[2]
If a large part of the users in an area want/need the latest upstream
code, then a cross-distribution community-effort would actually be:
- less work (only done once for all distributions), and
- remove the risk that packages installed from backports/PPA/... have
a negative effect on the whole system.
Unless all users would consider using the versions in stable pointless,
Debian could continue to ship the software in stable.
But comparing backports with a flatpak solution for users who want the
latest upstream code, I see all the benefits at the flatpak solution.
When it is both less work for Debian and a better result for users,
I do not see the point why Debian should compete with that effort.
> Steffen
cu
Adrian
[1] some problems always slip into a stable
[2] e.g. by also pulling in an update of some library or python module
that might have functionality changes or new bugs
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
Reply to: