[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Let's enable AppArmor by default (why not?)

On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 11:30:30AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Aug 2017 at 06:50:00 +0000, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > Can we integrate these LSM policies into our testing frameworks (e.g.
> > autopkgtests), so we can start having automated tests of even basic
> > functionality.  Or will that happen "out of the box" if we enable it by
> > default (and, possibly, enable it on our test hosts)?
> In practice probably only if our test hosts change from being lxc
> containers to being full virtual machines, which would be good for
> other aspects of test coverage too (flatpak/bubblewrap currently skip
> many of their autopkgtests, and so does debootstrap).

FWIW, my last upload of debci has a prototype qemu backend. I want to
switch to that sooner rather than later.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: