[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Accepted thermald 1.5.4-2.1 (source amd64) into testing-proposed-updates

Hi Adam,

On 18/06/17 12:14, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 08:41 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> What was the intent of this upload? If it was to try and get the updated 
>> package into the release, then a) it's (far) too late and b) it should 
>> have been discussed, not just uploaded to t-p-u.
> Ping?
> As you uploaded the package to t-p-u before the release, it has now
> ended up in proposed-updates.
> However, it is *still* unfixed in unstable. What's your plan for getting
> that sorted? We will not be including the package in a stretch point
> release until the fix is applied in unstable.

I've double checked and the the version of thermald in unstable 1.6.0-3
contains this upstream fix, this landed in the 1.6.0 release of thermald:

commit 5f1be4d9d6f3b27d2c9884f833ca05cdcb4428e0
Author: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Fri Mar 3 22:19:25 2017 -0800

    Update release number

(this was to 1.6.0)

commit 91a53d8b7789f45727b7349c8390ff16cc760958
Author: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Fri Mar 3 22:09:25 2017 -0800

    Remove deprecated files

commit 405dcc0a6464d92e656789a5a76bb23f479975ea
Author: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Fri Mar 3 21:40:45 2017 -0800

    Add Kabylake and Broadwell-GT processor models

(the fix in question)

> (As a side note, given that you are the maintainer of the package, why
> was the upload version -2.1?)

Good point. My fail

> Regards,
> Adam


Reply to: