On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 10:21:27AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:07:20PM +0100, James Clarke wrote: > > There already effectively is a semi-"primary" implementation given that > > sbuild is used on the buildds. > > Yes that is a very strong fact in favour of sbuild. If by "in favour" you mean in favour of using sbuild instead of pbuilder on your own machine, I think James' point was that the fact that sbuild is run on the buildds is a reason *not* to run it locally. Your package will be built using sbuild on the buildds anyway, so testing with pbuilder locally could expose bugs. (disclaimer: I use sbuild) -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature