Re: unattended-upgrades by default
On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 02:29:12PM -0800, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> On Jan 06 2017, Santiago Vila <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > If we want to be the Universal OS, we can't assume that any time
> > (not chosen by the user) is ok to do an upgrade.
> If we want to be the Universal OS, we can't assume that users will
> explicitly trigger an install of security upgrades either. Nor can we
> assume that running without security updates is acceptable.
> What now?
Now we can't be the Universal OS, no matter what we do :-)