Re: unattended-upgrades by default
On Jan 06 2017, Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> wrote:
> If we want to be the Universal OS, we can't assume that any time
> (not chosen by the user) is ok to do an upgrade.
If we want to be the Universal OS, we can't assume that users will
explicitly trigger an install of security upgrades either. Nor can we
assume that running without security updates is acceptable.
What now?
(Sorry for not being constructive, but these "Universal OS" arguments
can really be used to argue for and against anything).
Best,
-Nikolaus
--
GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F
Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F
»Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«
Reply to: