[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Building architecture:all packages



On Sat, 2016-11-12 at 15:13 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
[...]
> If manually specifying that is needed, pixfrogger is another case that
> should declare a list rather than a single arch: i386 is basically gone
> other than hardware emulation on amd64, armhf is a better supported 32-bit
> arch these days (at least counting porters and new gear).
[...]

Simpler solution: remove fenix, pixbros and pixfrogger.  The world
doesn't need a 32-bit only game library and 2 derivative games.
(fenix is dead upstream - homepage is still up but the links are all
broken; it's never had a new upstream version in Debian.)

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
If you seem to know what you are doing, you'll be given more to do.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: