Re: Building architecture:all packages
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 05:47:00PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-11-12 at 15:13 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > If manually specifying that is needed, pixfrogger is another case that
> > should declare a list rather than a single arch: i386 is basically gone
> > other than hardware emulation on amd64, armhf is a better supported 32-bit
> > arch these days (at least counting porters and new gear).
>
> Simpler solution: remove fenix, pixbros and pixfrogger. The world
> doesn't need a 32-bit only game library and 2 derivative games.
> (fenix is dead upstream - homepage is still up but the links are all
> broken; it's never had a new upstream version in Debian.)
I have no particular attachment to pixfrogger et al, but the underlying
problem isn't new and isn't likely to be fixed by whack-a-mole.
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@debian.org]
Reply to: