Re: [Pkg-dns-devel] Bug#833309: "Browserified" stuff (knot-resolver-module-http: please package embedded epoch.js separately)
Joerg Jaspert writes ("Re: [Pkg-dns-devel] Bug#833309: "Browserified" stuff (knot-resolver-module-http: please package embedded epoch.js separately)"):
> On 14466 March 1977, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> > If you insist I can add build.sh script to the missing-source, but
>
> No, you do not put it in missing-source foo. You use it during the build
> of your package, thats the correct thing to do.
I agree almost completely. (You missed out an apostrophe.)
> > that's a new information for me that we are now doing distro
> > just for hipsters that can't read and write more than one twitter
> > message at the time, and can't read a simple makefile.
>
> [You] forgot later updates to the package not done by you. There is
> no reason why a security team should have to learn the above steps. They
> should edit the source and just build the package and that should do the
> right thing.
I agree - modulo your use of an insult, which I have redacted (see
below).
> Not needing to dig up whatever crap may be needed for
> todays hip sillyscript transformation.
However, I think this kind of language is is really beyond the pale at
least for debian-devel. If you want to rant like that please keep it
to places where the people you are insulting are absent.
I recommend bars. (Having just got back from the pub myself, where we
had some good times ranting about various crap.)
Thanks,
Ian.
--
Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
Reply to: