Re: Is missing SysV-init support a bug?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Is missing SysV-init support a bug?
From: Bart Schouten <list@xenhideout.nl>
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 21:23:58 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] e3424bacb003ef1ad2ff113b716c7f93@dds.nl>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 3bad41ee-c36b-02a3-dcdf-437cc2de770a@NTLWorld.com>
References: <[🔎] 1ac2bbce0e1c284cc6761ce8dadf7d51@dds.nl> <[🔎] 3bad41ee-c36b-02a3-dcdf-437cc2de770a@NTLWorld.com>

Jonathan de Boyne Pollard schreef op 28-08-2016 13:56:

Bart Schouten:

Personally I do not run a non-SystemD system, [...]

Then please spell the name correctly.  It is no more "SystemD" than
inetd is "INetD" or rsyslogd is "RSysLogD".  It is "systemd".

You'll be doing yourself a favour.  For better or for worse, the
mis-spelling has become a shibboleth by which people tend to recognize
mischievous pot-stirrers at a glance.


Oh please.

You will now demonstrate your superiority by claiming you know thebetter spelling?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is missing SysV-init support a bug?
  - From: Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org>
- Re: Is missing SysV-init support a bug?
  - From: Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no>

References:
- Re: Is missing SysV-init support a bug?
  - From: Bart Schouten <list@xenhideout.nl>
- Is missing SysV-init support a bug?
  - From: Jonathan de Boyne Pollard <J.deBoynePollard-newsgroups@NTLWorld.com>

Prev by Date: Re: libsystemd
Next by Date: Re: removal instead of orphaning?
Previous by thread: Is missing SysV-init support a bug?
Next by thread: Re: Is missing SysV-init support a bug?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread