On 28/08/16 12:43, Jonathan de Boyne Pollard wrote: > Simon McVittie: > >> Once per thread about systemd, I point out that dbus-daemon links to >> both libapparmor and libselinux - which results in at least one >> useless library for literally everyone with dbus installed, since >> "major" LSMs don't stack, so nobody can possibly be using both >> AppArmor and SELinux at the same time. Oddly enough, nobody has >> complained about that, only about libsystemd... >> > Which rather neatly brings us to something that I've been wondering > about for some time. It's a pointless package dependency. But for > novelty it's one that the people who *use* systemd might be interested > in, rather than the people who *want to avoid* systemd. > > Consider the "initscripts" package. > > The "systemd" package has an explicit package dependency from it (in > both Debian 8 and the prospective Debian 9). > > * > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/tree/debian/control?h=debian/215-18&id=b1e8aa81062a0fcbcc27b99144521579ab873245#n56 That commit is from systemd 215-18 which is over a year old. The version of systemd in unstable has no such dependency. In fact I don't even have initscripts installed on my laptop. You can read the systemd changelog to see why it was originally needed. James
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature