Re: spammers closing bugs in BTS

[Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <kon@iki.fi>]

Daniel Pocock <daniel@pocock.pro> writes:

> I was only talking about control emails (e.g. the -done address and
> control@).  The requirements for opening bugs or submitting comments
> (without pseudo-headers) could remain as they are.

I don't believe the spammer intended to close the bug.  The bug
had already been closed by mailing the -done address in January
2015 and the spammer could easily scrape that address from the
bug web page.

That kind of thing seems less likely to happen with control@
or pseudo-headers.