Re: spammers closing bugs in BTS
Daniel Pocock <email@example.com> writes:
> I was only talking about control emails (e.g. the -done address and
> control@). The requirements for opening bugs or submitting comments
> (without pseudo-headers) could remain as they are.
I don't believe the spammer intended to close the bug. The bug
had already been closed by mailing the -done address in January
2015 and the spammer could easily scrape that address from the
bug web page.
That kind of thing seems less likely to happen with control@