Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 10.08.2016, 17:30 +0100 schrieb Simon McVittie: > For software with a reasonably helpful upstream and a reasonably sane > build system, I've often found that jumping through the necessary > hoops to write debian/copyright takes about as long as the rest of the > packaging put together. This is demotivating: I didn't join this project > to copy copyright information around, I joined this project to make an > operating system. I agree with that sentiment, thanks for bringing this up. Let me express my thought in that direction. I question the value of precise debian/copyright files, or at least question the effort-to-value ratio. The legal situation is generally not affected by whether we have course or fine copyright files, or whether we have them at all. Software does not get more free if we meticulously update copyright years or list individual authors. And to the best of my knowledge, our copyright files are not used in any systematic way. (If they were, this would add value and add motivation to work on this, and with machine-readable copyright files, it might happen some day. But currently, there is not.) A while ago, the most useful aspect of debian/copyright was the homepage field, but that is now where it belongs, in the package metadata. So my impression is that debian/copyright files are a mostly write-only exercise, and a way of forcing developers to check the license before packaging something. I do not deny that there is something pleasing about a very written, detailed, elaborate, up-to-date, machine-readable debian/copyright file. Similar to how there is something pleasing about a extensive and well-sorted stamp collection. But if we discuss the kind of copyright precision we want, let us not only discuss and define the ideal debian/copyright information, but also think about what really really has to be in there, and so what is the minimal, most effortless debian/copyright that still makes us happy. Let me give an example of a less labor intensive copyright fragment: I have started using this stanza Files: debian/* Copyright: held by the contributors mentioned in debian/changelog License: <same as the package> which might be an overestimation (a contributor mentioned in debian/changelog does not necessarily own copyright), but it works for many packages, only needs the license to be set once, and does not require any changes from then on. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org • https://people.debian.org/~nomeata XMPP: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de • GPG-Key: 0xF0FBF51F https://www.joachim-breitner.de/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part