(I'll drop -devel starting from next email, following up on debian-legal isntead) >If you agree, I think it's better to ask the question instead at >‘debian-legal’. Hi Debian-Legal list :) forwarding the discussion from -devel here Basically, we thought OpenWatcom license wasn't DFSG for Debain standards, and now since I would like to put Virtualbox back in main, I'm trying to see if some statement clarifying the license is sufficient to make it dfsg. I'm adding some pointers to the RFP bug, and to the public discussion that is ongoing upstream. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=376431 https://github.com/open-watcom/open-watcom-v2/issues/271 thanks for reading :) Gianfranco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature