[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Next steps for gitlab.debian (Re: GitLab B.V. to host free-software GitLab for Debian project)

On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 05:12:01PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jul 2016, Alexandre Viau wrote:
> > On 28/07/16 02:40 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> > > At this point, I'm dropping work on gitlab for debian and moving to less
> > > controversial alternative pagure.
> > 
> > Pagure looks great and I am happy to see that we are finally moving
> > towards something that (more) people agree with.
> > 
> > Thank you for your efforts, I am impressed that you still want to work
> > on this project even if we are not going to use Gitlab.
> > 
> > Once again, I would like to mention that I want to help this move
> > forward as I consider it very important.
> > 
> > Is there a list of things that have to be done where I can give a hand?
> I also looked into pagure and I see two problems: it is not packaged and it
> depends on fedmsg for usermanagement (it also supports PAM, but this is
> usually not something I really like.. Both tasks should get solved somehow.
why not PAM? PAM could totally have a different config than login/ssh,
we could allow LDAP, PGSQL, whatever for this particular PAM service.
While SSH continues to use /etc/shadow, as an example.

I dont have experience with Pagura, but I've done it for other services

> Alex - with his alioth admin hat on

1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

keybase: http://keybase.io/gfa

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: