Re: Next steps for gitlab.debian (Re: GitLab B.V. to host free-software GitLab for Debian project)
On Fri, 29 Jul 2016, gustavo panizzo <gfa> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 05:12:01PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Jul 2016, Alexandre Viau wrote:
> >
> > > On 28/07/16 02:40 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> > > > At this point, I'm dropping work on gitlab for debian and moving to less
> > > > controversial alternative pagure.
> > >
> > > Pagure looks great and I am happy to see that we are finally moving
> > > towards something that (more) people agree with.
> > >
> > > Thank you for your efforts, I am impressed that you still want to work
> > > on this project even if we are not going to use Gitlab.
> > >
> > > Once again, I would like to mention that I want to help this move
> > > forward as I consider it very important.
> > >
> > > Is there a list of things that have to be done where I can give a hand?
> > I also looked into pagure and I see two problems: it is not packaged and it
> > depends on fedmsg for usermanagement (it also supports PAM, but this is
> > usually not something I really like.. Both tasks should get solved somehow.
> why not PAM? PAM could totally have a different config than login/ssh,
> we could allow LDAP, PGSQL, whatever for this particular PAM service.
> While SSH continues to use /etc/shadow, as an example.
I would prefer not have system users (I know thats possible with PAM, but it
is imho pita)
alex
Reply to: