Re: Browserified files and DFSG
On 2016, ജൂലൈ 11 2:46:23 PM IST, Neil Williams <email@example.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 12:06:57 +0530
>Pirate Praveen <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> There is a bug with severity serious filed against libjs-handlebars
>>  (it is also a bug in ruby-handlebars-assets).
>> The corresponding source code is present in libjs-handlebars (only in
>> experimental right now, but it could be reuploaded to unstable once I
>> have clarity).
>> It needs grunt to be packaged  to be able to browserify it in
>0: minification using grunt produces code which is not simple to patch,
>especially when multiple patches need to be applied to a single file,
>but grunt is a means to an end, not necessarily a requirement itself.
>1: The objective of minification can be resolved using minification
>tools other than grunt in many cases - e.g. uglify.
You are talking about a different issue. handlebars.js is not minified. I know about uglify because I use that tool to remove minified js in other packages.
>> think it is serious enough to be removed from debian or moved to
>It's not just "nice", it is necessary. It's not just "browsetrify",
>it's a step in the build process.
You are mixing up issues here. Minification creates unreadable obfuscated code and I don't have a disagreement there. We are talking about rearranged, still readable and modifiable code here.
lintian will give an error in the first case and not in the second.
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.