On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 10:11:23PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > The point has been made that there are lots of other clients in Debian main > that only talk to a single, proprietary server implementation; so if snapd > did only talk to the Canonical store, I believe its placement in main would > still be consistent with archive policy / past Technical Committee > decisions. Right. It seems I have a different opinion here than the project has in general, and because of that, I think it's as OK for snapd to be in main as those other packages. And becaus snapd now has, or is getting, support for other server sides, and there's a free one appearing, even if I wasn't, it would still be OK. -- Schrödinger's backup hypothesis: the condition of any backup is undefined until a restore is attempted. -- andrewsh
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature