On Sun, 2016-06-05 at 18:41 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 02:22:18AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Sun, 2016-06-05 at 12:22 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > [Please CC me on replies. Aside: in my previous mail, I set both > > > Mail-Followup-To and Reply-To to include myself. What mailer and mechanism did > > > you use to reply that didn't look at either of those headers?] > > > > Evolution, Reply to List (Ctrl-L). > > Thanks; looks like that's https://bugs.debian.org/153244 . > > > > Sounds great! > > > > > > Would that potentially make it easier to run via dpkg trigger, rather than > > > postinst, so that it does less duplicate work during an apt run that involves > > > multiple kernel-related packages? > > > > No, I think that would result in worse decisions about what the default > > kernel version should be. > > Depends on the criteria for setting the default kernel version; ideally > that should always produce the same result for a given set of kernel > packages (assuming the user hasn't overridden it). > If I agreed with that I wouldn't have asked the original question, would I? See <[🔎] 1465143498.2847.227.camel@decadent.org.uk>. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings The obvious mathematical breakthrough [to break modern encryption] would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers. - Bill Gates
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part