On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 11:23:40AM +0200, Francois Gouget wrote: > So I looked to see whether the Debian Policy was saying multi-arch is a > should, a must or something else. > > It turns out it does not say anything of value: multi-arch is mentioned > as being an exception to the FHS in section "9.1.1 File System > Structure" and in footnotes 60, 78 and 79. That's all! yes, that's rather odd and annoying. it would be great if someone could pick up the existing work and make sure Multi-Arch *is* properly documented in policy… > That does not seem compatible with multi-arch being a completed goal of > the old-stable release. So what about adding a section like this: there are already 7 or so bugs about multi-arch missing in various places in policy, I'd suggest you go to the BTS, search for those and help there. -- cheers, Holger
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature