Matthias Klose wrote: > [...] when unstable is out of sync, and should be forbidden for a set > of core packages from my point of view. Exactly; there are some packages that can't just be removed, or the whole port would be broken. We could say that fixing RC bugs in those packages is a requirement for the port to be releaseable. I think the architecture release criteria is really lacking that kind of detail to judge ports by. But now, we have a quite good definition of what are 'core' packages of each port, from the rebootstrapping work. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain steven@pyro.eu.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature