[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: How to handle JavaScript npm + gulp web GUI packaging?



Quoting Thomas Goirand (2016-02-21 02:05:37)
> On 02/12/2016 09:22 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Quoting Thomas Goirand (2016-02-12 11:51:41)
> >> On 02/12/2016 05:23 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >>> Quoting Thomas Goirand (2016-02-12 08:27:12)
> >>>> I would like to package a web app which contains Javascript stuff, 
> >>>> which are using npm + gulp (to disclose everything: I am packaging 
> >>>> fuel-web).
> >>>
> >>> [details on dirty upstream build routines snipped]
> >>>
> >>>> I'd like to fix this in a better way so that Fuel can be fully 
> >>>> uploaded to Debian main. How to make this all in a Debian policy 
> >>>> compliant way?
> >>>
> >>> I suggest as first step to avoid cross-posting: I see no need for 
> >>> involving all Debian developers in this - Javascript Maintainers 
> >>> suffice. :-)
> >>
> >> I really thought it was of general interest, though I'm ok 
> >> following-up only there (though see below...).
> > 
> > I am confident that all especially interested in javascript packaging 
> > are happy to subscribe to our javascript-specific mailinglist.
> > 
> > So yes, please do follow-up there only.

> I'm register with *another* email address (which I use only for 
> receiving lists), not with my @debian.org address. I tried to get in 
> touch with team on IRC, but no reply so far.

I suggest to subscribe the email address that you send from (and 
configure that subscription to not receive anything, if that is what you 
wish).

That should help you to reach that list - no matter if the rejections 
you experience happen at the list end or somewhere else.  When in touch 
with the team you can (independently from your packaging question) raise 
the question there if perhaps list setup should be changed.


 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: signature


Reply to: