[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: How to change config script for multiarch?



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hi ,

I've solved this problem by:
(1) creating a pkg-config script, adding it as multiarch.
(2) editing the config script to use the pkg-config script.

In particular, for any non-standard variables, you can read them, by eg:

f90_compiler=$(pkg-config mypkg --variable=f90_compiler)

Its probably a good idea to document the config script as deprecated
in output, the man page, etc.

regards
Alastair


On 10/02/2016 07:12, NOKUBI Takatsugu wrote:
> I am a maintainer of chasen package. It contains chasen-config, it
> work as pkg-config like but it's a single script.
>
> Latest lintain reports:
> E: libchasen-dev: old-style-config-script-multiarch-path
usr/bin/chasen-config full text contains architecture specific dir
x86_64-linux-gnu
>
> But I want to keep libchasen-dev as Multi-Arch: same. Would you tell
> me finding the correct way to change the script?
>
>
> --
> Alastair McKinstry, <alastair@sceal.ie>, <mckinstry@debian.org>,
https://diaspora.sceal.ie/u/amckinstry
> Misentropy: doubting that the Universe is becoming more disordered.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWuwoCAAoJEMvmu05dmtOlhiUP/AuG7t8pMlzb4sgzvO//xAGK
O8aNRi789Yun4svsClBFrO/lv2GcynH5h6fqLL1oAndmBCX5cuMqjCwzUEEngCcK
Z5JiQ4MoQvFTqAneN0WGsvDPbq0Ofg6Lfti/FO3OsD6emvSn/f5f1RaF5mrd8vRd
SolUJDjtABV6DVqX8tY8rbf7u/ecdeYq0zMnEPsKEnUgrNSJQLGm0XC5YyANeDcG
2kpxPtPhHF9yz0yqV/hqiYTjDFR53vY29q/9QjjI9amdEV2btdeVf5cvtGFwXNQm
qL3VpeD0jbzMFYyIfcQy4IjhENkijyWl4BP9MD3sJ3vSpEjmLIfw5PGHVn2PgoEz
8zuAT4ub0D0ANRkA2JRLk9fVHtmGtEa4l2lpEztv4HeBeitEbKllOGQ1pU/GROax
2CmiGnxhG74T2qFC0bPDqHMKsc8W3SdXs6uYkuv+4WXiPuul14oD/7nOltGUc1p4
WHS5qSAZ/CV/madVZw1oeYDctehLYMk5RjYM32VO26lAoz0RkhAopdfmk+8QFUV8
nOJG2PKj1s4E3kJPZk2uLiFRSdhZe9PZXPnGcbJBpiEEw/Yo/6uhLOrm+n43gi/N
ZAPWnWuEMY/22r7XJg0NQwmNCCPSqGeUVG2k18A7nYlf/eIY+lhnauJUwpKEFass
JaVBSA7Fop2V1sPkOVzS
=84mc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: