[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Fixing dependency resolution of britney



Hi,

Quoting Niels Thykier (2016-02-02 23:27:21)
> Britney does *not* look at Build-Depends.  Only (Pre-)Depends.

okay, thanks for clarifying!

> So, Britney's dependency resolver ("InstallabilityTester") actually supports
> all of that.  What is lacking is support for passing the information to the
> resolver.
> 
> Note though that:
>  * Multi-arch - there are policy decisions involved.  Examples:
>    - Q: When is it permitted to depend on packages on foreign
>      architectures?

this sounds like before britney can accept any patches above question has to be
answered and agreed upon by the release team.

Why would we want to not always permit binary packages to depend on packages of
foreign architectures if these architectures are also release architectures and
the binary packages are installable together with packages from the native
architecture?

> Code: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/mirror/britney2.git
> Test suite:
>  https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/britney2-tests.git
> Docs: https://wiki.debian.org/CommittingBritneyChanges

Thanks for the links...

> Feel free to ask if you got any questions or suggestions for
> improvements.  I am happy to improve the documentation.

...and for the offer :)

cheers, josch

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: signature


Reply to: