[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Better Lintian checks



On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 7:45 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg
<sebastic@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> On 25-01-16 19:47, Bastien Roucaries wrote:
>> I expect more problems  detected in  the next few days
>
> I guess the autorejects for Multi-Arch: no are among those problems.
> The use of Multi-Arch: no was suggested by
>
>  https://lintian.debian.org/tags/old-style-config-script-multiarch-path.html
>
> The reject message refers to #768353 which was fixed in November 2014,
> but the fix is most likely not available in stable yet, and hence still
> an issue on the Debian infrastructure?
>
> If "Multi-Arch: no support in Debian is broken" is still true, the
> suggested fix for old-style-config-script-multiarch-path is not an
> actual solution.
>
> Should the autoreject be removed, or should lintian suggest a different fix?

This tag is not on autoreject list.

My warning was about
https://lintian.debian.org/tags/license-problem-json-evil.html,
https://lintian.debian.org/tags/license-problem-cc-by-nc-sa.html,
 https://lintian.debian.org/tags/license-problem-non-free-img-lenna.html

About you remark long term solution is here
https://lintian.debian.org/tags/old-style-config-script.html

Bastien



> Kind Regards,
>
> Bas
>
> --
>  GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
> Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
>


Reply to: