Re: Better Lintian checks

[Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>]

* Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl>, 2016-01-26, 07:45:
> The use of Multi-Arch: no was suggested by
>
> https://lintian.debian.org/tags/old-style-config-script-multiarch-path.html

The wording is unfortunate.

You should not add "Multi-Arch: no" to the control file, but instead 
remove the field, because "no" is the default.

And most of the time changing multi-archness isn't the correct course of 
action anyway...

> The reject message

Quoting the reject message would have been helpful...
I guess you're referring to this:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/mirror/dak.git/tree/daklib/checks.py?id=c51e71bbd9c2#n392

> refers to #768353 which was fixed in November 2014, 
> but the fix is most likely not available in stable yet,

The version graph says it's fixed in "dose3/3.3~beta1-3 (stable)".

--
Jakub Wilk