>russ writes:
>
>>Alas, the resulting distribution is still hopelessly compromised by
>>the NSA, who might be even worse than Lennart Poettering. To see
>>how deep the tendrils of US government infiltration go, just try
>>removing libselinux1, and marvel at how much concerted malevolent
>>effort has gone into destroying your freedom.
>
>and:
>
>>Or, alternately, you could research how and why one would use
>>shared libraries in a binary distribution to support optional
>>features. But that's boring, prosaic, and nowhere near as much fun
>>to write about.
>
>ahhh russ - good maaan:) here we have a hint of a possible
>solution, one where i'm going to need to speak to the systemd team
>for a feature request / design decision (and can i ask you and anyone
>else to do the same?). you've hit on what i believe is*the* perfect
>and acceptable decision that is hinted at by the ridiculousness of
>the drastic demonstration that i made [to modify and recompile debian
>packages]. of*course* libsystemd0 should be dynamically loaded, and
>the userspace applications make the decision*at runtime* as to what
>to do!