On Nov 06, Dima Kogan <dima@secretsauce.net> wrote: > Hi. Can we talk about this again? Should I Cc -devel, or is the I hope not. > reassignment to 'general' enough? It would be totally wrong. > The argument for guile in default 'make' is as before. And also the So I suppose that the arguments for not doing this are still valid as well. > current situation is misleading to users. The main feature of make 4.0 > is guile support. A user who wants this goes to 'apt-get install make', > sees 4.x being installed, and happily attempts to use this shiny new > guile support, only to discover that their Makefiles do not work as > expected. How many packages in Debian actually use guile makefiles? -- ciao, Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature