[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: libstdc++ follow-up transitions



Hi,

On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:12:40PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> hunspell is one notable exception, if it does indeed need renaming (I
> haven't verified)

It was already bin-NMUed without renaming 16d ago. That said, a testbuild
of LO with non-transitioned libs did NOT give me a build failure and
installing libhunspell-1.3-0 1.3.3-3 from stretch doesn't break spellchecking
in LO in sid (already built with gcc 5). So...

Regards,

Rene


Reply to: